{"id":1154,"date":"2026-05-04T18:00:44","date_gmt":"2026-05-04T18:00:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/didaktos.io\/?page_id=1154"},"modified":"2026-10-16T02:14:45","modified_gmt":"2026-10-16T02:14:45","slug":"rubrica-analitica","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/didaktos.io\/es\/resources\/analytic-rubric\/","title":{"rendered":"Generador de r\u00fabricas anal\u00edticas"},"content":{"rendered":"

An analytic rubric tells students exactly what a strong piece of work looks like, criterion by criterion, and lets you grade a stack of projects consistently. Writing one by hand takes time: choosing the criteria, defining four levels for each and making every descriptor observable. This guide shows how to create an analytic rubric with Didaktos AI in five steps, with screenshots of the app, using a 6th grade science fair project as the example.<\/p>\n

What is an analytic rubric?<\/h2>\n

An analytic rubric is a table. Each row<\/strong> is a criterion, one part of the task you are assessing, such as the hypothesis or the conclusion. Each column<\/strong> is a performance level, usually from 4 (exemplary) to 1 (beginning). Each cell describes what the work looks like at that level.<\/p>\n

A holistic rubric<\/strong> gives one overall score. An analytic rubric gives a score per criterion, so students see exactly where they are strong and what to improve next. That is why it works well for projects, essays, labs and presentations.<\/p>\n

How to create an analytic rubric in 5 steps<\/h2>\n

Step 1: Choose Analytic Rubric<\/h3>\n

Open Didaktos AI<\/a>, click the Assessment<\/strong> category and choose Analytic Rubric<\/em> in Resource Type<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

Choosing Analytic Rubric in the Assessment tools of Didaktos AI<\/title>The Resource Type list in the Assessment category is open, from Formative Quiz to Answer Key with Rationale, with Analytic Rubric selected.<\/desc><\/linearGradient><\/filter><\/defs>didaktos.io\/didaktos-ai<\/text>Didaktos AI<\/text>Your Educational Copilot<\/text>EN<\/text>ES<\/text>Tool<\/text>2\/4<\/text>Resource Type<\/text>Analytic Rubric<\/text>Subject<\/text>Select subject<\/text>Grade Level<\/text>Select level<\/text>Context \/ Standard<\/text>Select standard<\/text>Output Format<\/text>Auto<\/text>CSV Table<\/text>Methodology<\/text>PBL<\/text>Cooperative<\/text>Flipped<\/text>Gamification<\/text>STEM<\/text>UDL<\/text>Inquiry<\/text>+8 more<\/text>Topic \/ Instructions<\/text>E.g., Water cycle for 3rd grade…<\/text>Attach<\/text>Optional: image, PDF, Word, .txt, .md, .csv<\/text>Generate Resource<\/text>PREVIEW<\/text>Document<\/text>Outline<\/text>Print<\/text>Edit<\/text>Download<\/text>Copy<\/text>ACTIONS<\/text>Simplify (UDL)<\/text>Create quiz<\/text>Create rubric<\/text>Translate<\/text>Expand<\/text>Your resource will appear here<\/text>Fill in the form and press Generate Resource<\/text>Formative Quiz<\/text>Summative Exam<\/text>Analytic Rubric<\/text>Checklist<\/text>Auto-Feedback<\/text>Bloom Question Bank<\/text>Diagnostic Exam<\/text>Answer Key with Rationale<\/text>1<\/text>2<\/text><\/svg>
In Assessment, choose Analytic Rubric.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Step 2: Describe the task<\/h3>\n

Set the Subject<\/strong>, Grade Level<\/strong> and Context \/ Standard<\/strong>. The Output Format<\/strong> changes to CSV Table<\/em> by itself, because a rubric is a table. Then describe the task in Topic \/ Instructions<\/strong>: what students produce, the grade, and the parts you want to assess.<\/p>\n

\n

Rubric for a 6th grade science fair project. Assess the question and hypothesis, the procedure, data and graphs, the conclusion and the oral presentation. Students work in pairs over three weeks.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Describing an analytic rubric for a 6th grade science fair project<\/title>The form set to Analytic Rubric, Natural Sciences, Middle School and NGSS, with the Output Format set automatically to CSV Table and a description listing the five parts of the project to assess.<\/desc><\/linearGradient><\/filter><\/defs>didaktos.io\/didaktos-ai<\/text>Didaktos AI<\/text>Your Educational Copilot<\/text>EN<\/text>ES<\/text>Configure<\/text>3\/4<\/text>Resource Type<\/text>Analytic Rubric<\/text>Subject<\/text>Natural Sciences \/\u2026<\/text>Grade Level<\/text>Middle School<\/text>Context \/ Standard<\/text>NGSS<\/text>Output Format<\/text>Auto<\/text>CSV Table<\/text>Methodology<\/text>PBL<\/text>Cooperative<\/text>Flipped<\/text>Gamification<\/text>STEM<\/text>UDL<\/text>Inquiry<\/text>+8 more<\/text>Topic \/ Instructions<\/text>Rubric for a 6th grade science fair project. Assess the<\/text>question and hypothesis, the procedure, data and graphs,<\/text>the conclusion and the oral presentation. Students work in<\/text>pairs over three weeks.<\/text>Attach<\/text>Optional: image, PDF, Word, .txt, .md, .csv<\/text>Generate Resource<\/text>PREVIEW<\/text>Document<\/text>Outline<\/text>Print<\/text>Edit<\/text>Download<\/text>Copy<\/text>ACTIONS<\/text>Simplify (UDL)<\/text>Create quiz<\/text>Create rubric<\/text>Translate<\/text>Expand<\/text>Your resource will appear here<\/text>Fill in the form and press Generate Resource<\/text>1<\/text>2<\/text>3<\/text><\/svg>
Name the task, the grade and the parts you want to assess; the table format is set for you.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Tip:<\/strong> if you name the criteria, Didaktos uses yours. If you do not, it chooses four to six that fit the task.<\/p>\n

Step 3: Review the rubric<\/h3>\n

Press Generate Resource<\/strong>. You get a table with your criteria in rows and four levels in columns, Exemplary (4)<\/em>, Proficient (3)<\/em>, Developing (2)<\/em> and Beginning (1)<\/em>, plus a total score and space for written feedback.<\/p>\n

A generated analytic rubric with five criteria and four levels<\/title>The analytic rubric for the science fair project: five criteria in rows, four performance levels from Exemplary (4) to Beginning (1) in columns, and a total out of 20 with a feedback line.<\/desc><\/linearGradient><\/filter><\/defs>didaktos.io\/didaktos-ai<\/text>Didaktos AI<\/text>Your Educational Copilot<\/text>EN<\/text>ES<\/text>+ New<\/text>Template<\/text>Resource Type<\/text>Analytic Rubric<\/text>Subject<\/text>Natural Sciences \/\u2026<\/text>Grade Level<\/text>Middle School<\/text>Context \/ Standard<\/text>NGSS<\/text>Output Format<\/text>Auto<\/text>CSV Table<\/text>Methodology<\/text>PBL<\/text>Cooperative<\/text>Flipped<\/text>Gamification<\/text>STEM<\/text>UDL<\/text>Inquiry<\/text>+8 more<\/text>Topic \/ Instructions<\/text>Rubric for a 6th grade science fair project. Assess the<\/text>question and hypothesis, the procedure, data and graphs,<\/text>the conclusion and the oral presentation. Students work in<\/text>pairs over three weeks.<\/text>Attach<\/text>Optional: image, PDF, Word, .txt, .md, .csv<\/text>Generate Resource<\/text>PREVIEW<\/text>Document<\/text>Outline<\/text>Print<\/text>Edit<\/text>Download<\/text>Copy<\/text>ACTIONS<\/text>Simplify (UDL)<\/text>Create quiz<\/text>Create rubric<\/text>Translate<\/text>Expand<\/text>Analytic Rubric: Science Fair Project<\/text>Natural Sciences \u00b7 6th grade \u00b7 NGSS \u00b7 5 criteria \u00b7 4 levels \u00b7 20 points<\/text>Criteria<\/text>Exemplary (4)<\/text>Proficient (3)<\/text>Developing (2)<\/text>Beginning (1)<\/text>Hypothesis<\/text>Testable, explained<\/text>Testable<\/text>Vague<\/text>Missing<\/text>Procedure<\/text>Clear, repeatable<\/text>Mostly clear<\/text>Steps missing<\/text>Unclear<\/text>Data & graphs<\/text>Accurate, labelled<\/text>Minor errors<\/text>Incomplete<\/text>No data<\/text>Conclusion<\/text>Uses evidence<\/text>Some evidence<\/text>Restates data<\/text>No conclusion<\/text>Presentation<\/text>Clear, confident<\/text>Clear<\/text>Hard to follow<\/text>Not ready<\/text>Total: ___ \/ 20 \u00b7 Feedback: one strength and one next step for each pair<\/text>1<\/text>2<\/text>3<\/text><\/svg>
Criteria in rows, levels in columns, observable descriptors and a total score.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Check each row: could two teachers read the descriptor and give the same score? If a descriptor says \u201cgood\u201d or \u201cnice\u201d, it is not observable yet.<\/p>\n

Step 4: Adjust it with Edit<\/h3>\n

Press Edit<\/strong> and ask for the change in plain words. Some requests that work well:<\/p>\n

    \n
  • \u201cAdd a criterion for lab safety.\u201d<\/li>\n
  • \u201cUse three levels instead of four.\u201d<\/li>\n
  • \u201cWrite the descriptors so 6th graders can self-assess.\u201d<\/li>\n
  • \u201cGive the presentation criterion double weight.\u201d<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
    Adding a criterion to the rubric with the Edit chat<\/title>The rubric with the Edit panel open and a request to add a lab safety criterion and write the descriptors so students can self-assess.<\/desc><\/linearGradient><\/filter><\/defs>didaktos.io\/didaktos-ai<\/text>Didaktos AI<\/text>Your Educational Copilot<\/text>EN<\/text>ES<\/text>+ New<\/text>Template<\/text>Resource Type<\/text>Analytic Rubric<\/text>Subject<\/text>Natural Sciences \/\u2026<\/text>Grade Level<\/text>Middle School<\/text>Context \/ Standard<\/text>NGSS<\/text>Output Format<\/text>Auto<\/text>CSV Table<\/text>Methodology<\/text>PBL<\/text>Cooperative<\/text>Flipped<\/text>Gamification<\/text>STEM<\/text>UDL<\/text>Inquiry<\/text>+8 more<\/text>Topic \/ Instructions<\/text>Rubric for a 6th grade science fair project. Assess the<\/text>question and hypothesis, the procedure, data and graphs,<\/text>the conclusion and the oral presentation. Students work in<\/text>pairs over three weeks.<\/text>Attach<\/text>Optional: image, PDF, Word, .txt, .md, .csv<\/text>Generate Resource<\/text>PREVIEW<\/text>Document<\/text>Outline<\/text>Print<\/text>Edit<\/text>Download<\/text>Copy<\/text>ACTIONS<\/text>Simplify (UDL)<\/text>Create quiz<\/text>Create rubric<\/text>Translate<\/text>Expand<\/text>Analytic Rubric: Science Fair Project<\/text>Natural Sciences \u00b7 6th grade \u00b7 NGSS \u00b7 5 criteria \u00b7 4 levels \u00b7 20 points<\/text>Criteria<\/text>Exemplary (4)<\/text>Proficient (3)<\/text>Developing (2)<\/text>Beginning (1)<\/text>Hypothesis<\/text>Testable, explained<\/text>Testable<\/text>Vague<\/text>Missing<\/text>Procedure<\/text>Clear, repeatable<\/text>Mostly clear<\/text>Steps missing<\/text>Unclear<\/text>Data & graphs<\/text>Accurate, labelled<\/text>Minor errors<\/text>Incomplete<\/text>No data<\/text>Conclusion<\/text>Uses evidence<\/text>Some evidence<\/text>Restates data<\/text>No conclusion<\/text>Presentation<\/text>Clear, confident<\/text>Clear<\/text>Hard to follow<\/text>Not ready<\/text>Edit<\/text>Edit resource<\/text>Make shorter<\/text>Add examples<\/text>More formal tone<\/text>Simplify vocabulary<\/text>Add a criterion for lab safety and write the<\/text>descriptors so 6th graders can self-assess.<\/text>1<\/text>2<\/text>3<\/text><\/svg>
    Add, remove or reword criteria by asking in plain words.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

    Step 5: Use it and share it<\/h3>\n

    Didaktos updates only what you asked for. When the rubric is ready, copy it or download it: as a Word file to print and hand out, or as a CSV file to open in Excel or Google Sheets.<\/p>\n

    The analytic rubric with the new lab safety criterion<\/title>The rubric now has a sixth row, Lab safety, highlighted, and the Copy and Download buttons are highlighted.<\/desc><\/linearGradient><\/filter><\/defs>didaktos.io\/didaktos-ai<\/text>Didaktos AI<\/text>Your Educational Copilot<\/text>EN<\/text>ES<\/text>+ New<\/text>Template<\/text>Resource Type<\/text>Analytic Rubric<\/text>Subject<\/text>Natural Sciences \/\u2026<\/text>Grade Level<\/text>Middle School<\/text>Context \/ Standard<\/text>NGSS<\/text>Output Format<\/text>Auto<\/text>CSV Table<\/text>Methodology<\/text>PBL<\/text>Cooperative<\/text>Flipped<\/text>Gamification<\/text>STEM<\/text>UDL<\/text>Inquiry<\/text>+8 more<\/text>Topic \/ Instructions<\/text>Rubric for a 6th grade science fair project. Assess the<\/text>question and hypothesis, the procedure, data and graphs,<\/text>the conclusion and the oral presentation. Students work in<\/text>pairs over three weeks.<\/text>Attach<\/text>Optional: image, PDF, Word, .txt, .md, .csv<\/text>Generate Resource<\/text>PREVIEW<\/text>Document<\/text>Outline<\/text>Print<\/text>Edit<\/text>Download<\/text>Copy<\/text>ACTIONS<\/text>Simplify (UDL)<\/text>Create quiz<\/text>Create rubric<\/text>Translate<\/text>Expand<\/text>Analytic Rubric: Science Fair Project<\/text>Natural Sciences \u00b7 6th grade \u00b7 NGSS \u00b7 5 criteria \u00b7 4 levels \u00b7 20 points<\/text>Criteria<\/text>Exemplary (4)<\/text>Proficient (3)<\/text>Developing (2)<\/text>Beginning (1)<\/text>Hypothesis<\/text>Testable, explained<\/text>Testable<\/text>Vague<\/text>Missing<\/text>Procedure<\/text>Clear, repeatable<\/text>Mostly clear<\/text>Steps missing<\/text>Unclear<\/text>Data & graphs<\/text>Accurate, labelled<\/text>Minor errors<\/text>Incomplete<\/text>No data<\/text>Conclusion<\/text>Uses evidence<\/text>Some evidence<\/text>Restates data<\/text>No conclusion<\/text>Presentation<\/text>Clear, confident<\/text>Clear<\/text>Hard to follow<\/text>Not ready<\/text>Lab safety<\/text>Always safe<\/text>Mostly safe<\/text>Needs reminders<\/text>Unsafe<\/text>Total: ___ \/ 20 \u00b7 Feedback: one strength and one next step for each pair<\/text>1<\/text>2<\/text><\/svg>
    The new criterion is added; copy the rubric or download it as Word or CSV.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

    Share the rubric with students before<\/em> they start the project, not only at grading time. It is the clearest description of success they will get.<\/p>\n

    Create a rubric from a lesson in one click<\/h2>\n

    If you already generated the lesson or the project guide in Didaktos, you do not need to start again. Press the Create rubric<\/strong> quick action under the preview, and Didaktos builds the rubric from that resource. See how to create assessments automatically<\/a>.<\/p>\n

    Tips for a strong analytic rubric<\/h2>\n
      \n
    • Four to six criteria.<\/strong> More than six is hard to use while grading.<\/li>\n
    • Observable words.<\/strong> \u201cLabels both axes and the units\u201d instead of \u201cgood graph\u201d.<\/li>\n
    • One idea per criterion.<\/strong> Split \u201cdata and conclusion\u201d into two rows.<\/li>\n
    • Describe the next level up.<\/strong> Students should see what to do to move from 2 to 3.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

      Need more ideas? See our rubric examples<\/a>, editable rubric templates<\/a> and the guide to rubrics for student projects<\/a>.<\/p>\n

      Frequently asked questions<\/h2>\n

      How many analytic rubrics can I create for free?<\/h3>\n

      Each rubric uses one generation. The free plan includes 10 generations every 30 days, Starter 50, and Pro is unlimited. See the plans<\/a>.<\/p>\n

      Can I base the rubric on my standards?<\/h3>\n

      Yes. Choose your standard in Context \/ Standard, such as Common Core, NGSS or TEKS, and the criteria align to it.<\/p>\n

      Can I use my school\u2019s rubric format?<\/h3>\n

      Yes, with a Pro plan. Attach your school\u2019s rubric as a PDF, Word file or photo, and Didaktos follows its layout and levels.<\/p>\n

      Can I create the rubric in Spanish?<\/h3>\n

      Yes. Switch the app to ES before generating, or use Translate on the finished rubric.<\/p>\n

      Create your next rubric<\/h2>\n

      Choose Analytic Rubric, describe the task in two sentences and have a ready-to-use rubric in under a minute. Open Didaktos AI<\/a>.<\/p>\n